AGE-ID-POLICY-CHECKLIST-READY
Why this deserves a source-of-truth card
Age and ID rules can be local, product-specific, service-specific, and policy-sensitive. AI tools may turn a vague staff note or old FAQ into a confident public answer. Keep the page practical: approved rules, source dates, who reviewed them, and what the AI must not say.
Copy/paste age and ID policy source card
Page / offer / product / event: [name and URL]
Customer-facing claim being reviewed: [paste exact wording]
Policy source: [license / written policy / booking terms / vendor rule / local rule / manager approval / other]
Source location: [file/link/system]
Source date and reviewer: [date + owner/manager]
Minimum age or eligibility rule: [paste only verified wording]
ID / verification requirement: [accepted IDs, timing, who checks, or N/A]
Exception rules: [guardian, membership, professional license, delivery, pickup, refund, transfer, or N/A]
Restricted products/services/locations: [paste exact scope]
Claims explicitly NOT approved: [legal advice / guaranteed eligibility / no-ID-needed / exception promises / safety claims / other]
Safe public wording: [approved short wording]
AI/search audit prompt: [ask AI to compare public text to approved source only]
Review cadence / expiration date: [monthly / policy change / license renewal / seasonal]
STOP PUBLISHING until: [owner verifies source, wording, and reviewer]
Safe wording patterns
Eligibility, age, and ID requirements can vary by product, service, location, event, and current policy. Please contact our team directly before purchasing, booking, or attending if your situation depends on an age, ID, licensing, or exception rule.
Internal note for AI/content tools: use only the approved source card. Do not infer age requirements, legal eligibility, delivery restrictions, guardian exceptions, or ID alternatives from similar pages or old FAQs.
Customer-safe fallback: I do not want to guess on an eligibility or ID requirement. Let me verify the current policy with a manager before giving you a specific answer.
AI audit prompt
You are reviewing a public page for age, ID, eligibility, restricted-product, booking, event-entry, delivery, or exception claims. Compare the draft below against the verified source card only. Do not add new claims. Flag any invented minimum age, ID alternative, legal eligibility, guardian exception, delivery promise, refund exception, licensing claim, or safety-sensitive wording.
Return: 1) exact unsupported claims, 2) source fields needed, 3) safer wording, 4) reviewer questions, and 5) STOP PUBLISHING triggers.
Verified source card:
[Paste source card]
Draft page or AI answer:
[Paste draft]Fast QA before publication
- Does every age, ID, eligibility, delivery, attendance, or exception claim point to a dated source?
- Does the wording avoid implying legal advice, guaranteed eligibility, or bypassable ID checks?
- Does it include a human contact path for edge cases and restricted-product questions?
- Does it separate broad marketing copy from official policy or terms?
- Does the AI audit compare against current facts rather than old FAQs, web snippets, or similar products?
How this connects to the paid system
This checklist is a narrow example of the source-control and AI-search audit patterns inside SEO After AI. The broader playbook helps owners map proof sources, refresh risky pages, and audit AI-visible claims before answer engines or chatbots repeat unsupported information.