ALLERGEN-INGREDIENT-PAGE-CHECKLIST-READY
Why this deserves a source-of-truth card
AI tools can turn a vague menu note, old PDF, staff answer, or supplier description into a confident public statement. That is risky when customers rely on ingredient, allergen, material, or dietary information. Keep the page practical: approved facts, source dates, who reviewed them, and what AI must not say.
STOP PUBLISHING: do not let AI claim that a product, dish, service, or material is allergen-free, gluten-free, vegan, safe for a medical condition, non-toxic, child-safe, pet-safe, certified, organic, FDA-approved, hypoallergenic, nut-free, dairy-free, or suitable for a specific dietary need unless the owner has a verified source and approved wording. When in doubt, route to a human reviewer and recommend direct staff confirmation.
Copy/paste allergen and ingredient source card
Page / product / menu item: [name and URL]
Customer-facing claim being reviewed: [paste exact wording]
Source type: [supplier sheet / recipe card / label / SDS / package / manager approval / certification / other]
Source location: [file/link/system]
Source date and reviewer: [date + owner/manager]
Ingredients/materials listed exactly as source says: [paste]
Allergen/dietary flags disclosed by source: [paste only verified details]
Cross-contact / substitution / prep variability note: [verified note or N/A]
Claims explicitly NOT approved: [allergen-free / gluten-free / vegan / organic / hypoallergenic / medical / safety / certification / other]
Safe public wording: [approved short wording]
AI/search audit prompt: [ask AI to compare public text to approved source only]
Review cadence / expiration date: [monthly / supplier change / recipe change / seasonal]
STOP PUBLISHING until: [owner verifies source, wording, and reviewer]Safe wording patterns
We list ingredients and allergen notes from our current source records when available, but recipes, suppliers, preparation methods, and substitutions can change. Please contact our team directly before ordering if you have an allergy, dietary restriction, or safety-sensitive question.Internal note for AI/content tools: use only the approved source card. Do not infer allergens, dietary suitability, certifications, medical safety, or ingredient absence from similar products or old pages.Customer-safe fallback: I do not want to guess on this. Let me verify the current ingredient/source record with a manager before giving you a specific answer.AI audit prompt
You are reviewing a public page for ingredient, allergen, material, dietary, or suitability claims. Compare the draft below against the verified source card only. Do not add new claims. Flag any invented allergen-free, gluten-free, vegan, organic, hypoallergenic, medical, safety, certification, child-safe, pet-safe, or FDA/regulatory wording.
Return: 1) exact unsupported claims, 2) source fields needed, 3) safer wording, 4) reviewer questions, and 5) STOP PUBLISHING triggers.
Verified source card:
[Paste source card]
Draft page or AI answer:
[Paste draft]Fast QA before publication
- Does every ingredient, allergen, dietary, certification, or material claim point to a dated source?
- Does the draft avoid implying medical safety, guaranteed absence, or suitability for a condition?
- Does it include a human contact path for allergy-sensitive or safety-sensitive questions?
- Does it handle recipe, supplier, substitution, seasonal, or preparation variability without overclaiming?
- Does the AI audit compare against current facts rather than old PDFs, web snippets, or similar products?
How this connects to the paid system
This checklist is a narrow example of the source-control and AI-search audit patterns inside SEO After AI. The broader playbook helps owners map proof sources, refresh risky pages, and audit AI-visible claims before answer engines or chatbots repeat unsupported information.