When to use it
This checklist fits course creators, training shops, paid communities, coaches, and small education businesses whose public pages, emails, LMS settings, and payment records can disagree. The goal is not to automate refunds or access decisions. The goal is to keep AI answers anchored to verified source fields.
Best fit
- Course access or login questions
- Enrollment/cutoff-date questions
- Cohort, live-session, or replay availability questions
- Certificate/completion eligibility questions
- Refund-window or support-scope questions
Do not use for
- Identity verification without an official system
- Manual payment exceptions
- Legal/credentialing claims
- Guarantees about outcomes, income, licensing, or certification value
- Any claim not already approved by the owner
Copy/paste course access source card
Course / product name: Official sales page URL: Approved enrollment status wording: Enrollment open/closed date and timezone: Payment processor proof location: LMS / member-platform proof location: Access start date: Access end date or lifetime-access wording: Login/reset official URL: Replay/library URL: Support channel and response window: Refund policy URL and deadline: Certificate/completion eligibility rule: Human owner for exceptions: Last reviewed by: Last reviewed date: Do-not-say claims:
Customer-safe answer template
Thanks for asking — I can help you check the official course access details. Based on the current source record I can confirm: - Course/product: [COURSE NAME] - Enrollment/access status: [APPROVED STATUS WORDING] - Official login or help link: [OFFICIAL URL] - Support channel: [SUPPORT CHANNEL] I should not guess about payment, refund, certificate, or exception eligibility from chat history alone. If your situation depends on a payment record, cohort change, refund deadline, or certificate review, I’ll route it to [OWNER/TEAM] with the relevant order or account details.
STOP PUBLISHING guardrails
- Stop if the AI answer invents enrollment availability, pricing, discounts, refund eligibility, or cohort dates.
- Stop if the support record and LMS record disagree.
- Stop if the answer implies a professional license, certification, job, income, or compliance outcome not present in approved copy.
- Stop if identity, payment, or account ownership cannot be verified through an official system.
- Stop if the customer asks for an exception, extension, chargeback, or private account change.
AI audit prompt
You are reviewing a proposed AI-generated support or AI-search answer for course access and enrollment accuracy. Compare the draft answer against this source card. Flag any claim about enrollment status, access dates, refund eligibility, certificate eligibility, cohort timing, login access, support response windows, or outcomes that is not directly supported. Return: 1. Unsupported claims to remove. 2. Missing source fields needed before publishing. 3. Customer-safe wording that avoids guessing. 4. Whether human owner review is required before sending.
Why this matters for AI search
Course businesses often have sales pages, checkout records, LMS permissions, email campaigns, and support macros that drift apart. AI search and chat tools can confidently summarize the wrong access window or refund rule unless a current source card is available. This worksheet is a small source-control layer for the bigger SEO After AI process.
If your bigger bottleneck is internal AI workflow rollout rather than public AI-search answers, the Small Business AI Profit Kit includes broader owner-review and prompt-governance templates.