Investigating
“We are investigating an issue affecting [service/feature/location]. The verified impact is [impact]. We will post the next update by [time] at [status/source link].”
SEO After AI • outage status • incident-source control
Outage pages, incident updates, AI search snippets, support macros, and chatbots can overpromise when customer impact, affected products, workarounds, SLAs, credits, and restoration timing live in different systems. Use this source card before publishing any customer-facing outage or degraded-service answer.
SERVICE-OUTAGE-STATUS-CARD-READY: Do not publish, index, email, or let an AI assistant answer service-outage status unless a human can point to the exact affected service, incident owner, customer impact, workaround, restoration status, next-update time, SLA/credit policy, and approved customer wording. Mark missing facts as NEEDS OWNER REVIEW.
| Field | Source to verify | Safe wording note |
|---|---|---|
| Incident / status ID | [Status-page incident, helpdesk ticket, monitoring alert, internal incident channel] | Match the public update to a real incident record before summarizing it. |
| Affected service or location | [Product, plan, feature, region, location, integration, carrier/vendor] | Do not imply all customers are affected if impact is partial. |
| Customer impact | [Unavailable, degraded, delayed, error rate, data sync lag, missed notifications, no impact] | Use the exact verified impact. Avoid dramatic or minimizing wording. |
| Current status | [Investigating / identified / monitoring / resolved / vendor pending / needs customer action] | Never infer resolution from one successful test or silence. |
| Workaround | [Approved temporary path, manual process, alternative channel, no workaround] | Only publish workarounds tested by the owner/team. |
| Next update | [Time, cadence, owner, status-page link] | Use “next update by” rather than invented restoration times. |
| SLA, credits, refunds, billing | [Terms, support policy, account owner review, billing system] | Route credits/refunds/SLA language to owner or billing review. |
| Do-not-say list | [Unsupported phrases AI must not repeat] | Examples: “fully restored,” “guaranteed by noon,” “refund approved,” “no data loss,” “SLA credit applies.” |
“We are investigating an issue affecting [service/feature/location]. The verified impact is [impact]. We will post the next update by [time] at [status/source link].”
“While [service] is affected, please use [approved workaround]. This workaround is temporary and does not change any account, billing, or SLA decision.”
“This issue depends on [vendor/integration/carrier]. We have escalated it and will update customers when [vendor/source] confirms the next status.”
“The issue is marked [resolved/monitoring] as of [time]. If you still see [symptom], send [evidence] to [support path] so we can verify your account or location.”
You are auditing service-outage status wording for a small business website, status page, help center, chatbot, support macro, or AI-search answer. Use only the source card below. Do not invent uptime, restoration timing, customer impact, workaround availability, SLA credits, refunds, data-loss status, vendor status, or final resolution.
Return:
1. Safe customer-facing answer under 120 words.
2. Claims that need source proof.
3. Missing fields that require NEEDS OWNER REVIEW.
4. SLA/billing/legal-sensitive stop risks.
5. A follow-up question list for the incident owner/support lead.
Source card:
[Paste service outage status source card here]This resource is a free companion to SEO After AI. It is for SaaS, ecommerce, local-service, membership, and support-led businesses that want answer engines and AI assistants to quote verified incident facts instead of inventing outage promises.